User talk:Terualexa
| This is Terualexa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Konner has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)I would love assistance with page "Jeremy Konner"
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi Wikipedia Community,
I am trying to get the page titled Jeremy Konner verified with proper sources, as well as getting him linked with pages such as Drunk History and Another Period. I created the original page but am stuck trying to find proper sources and how to link. If anyone around can assist and edit for me, I would be very grateful. Thanks so much, please don't hesitate to reach out for any questions or clarification.
Terualexa (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- I doubt random editors will be better able to find reliable sources that discuss Jeremy Konner than you, the original author of the page. Of the current references, #2, IMDb, is not a reliable source and should be removed. #3, Twitter, is even worse. #1 is used in a highly misleading way because the one Emmy that Drunk History won had nothing to do with Konner's work - in all categories for which it was nominated where Konner himself is mentioned, it did not win. #4 is not independent coverage but a press release from his alma mater. #5 and #9 are interviews, Konner talking about himself, not independent coverage. #7 is IMDb again. That leaves the article with two reliable third-party sources, #6 and #8. Neither of those has more than a single sentence of content on Konner. Personally I don't think the draft should have been accepted. If we pared it down to what reliable secondary sources have reported about Konner, we would end up with a one-sentence stub. I have added links to the Konner article to the pages on Drunk History and Another Period, but I'll also nominate the Konner article for a deletion discussion. Huon (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Jeremy Konner for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Konner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Konner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 19:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)