Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Ball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

Fred Ball

Likely non-notable. Could not find any sources that prove notability, and many of the g-hits were of namesakes. Two references given, one from IMDB, another a very short profile. Article itself does not give evidence for notability. Samuel Tan 09:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sure, his notability may be a side-effect of his very famous sister, but it is real nonetheless. The article already has two sources, and lots more are available; there are many biographies of Lucille Ball and they contain much usable information about him. For instance, this source is a brief profile of him in a published book, and there are lots more hits on Google Books that can be used. Mango juice^talk 13:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - between the book mention and the obituaries, just about enough coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. (I did initial cleanup.) The stub is poorly written, based on the IMDb filmography. Fred Ball was more important as a studio exec., director, and band manager than as an actor. There are additional sources that flesh this out. However, everything is in Lucille Ball's shadow. Border line. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Fred Ball

zproxy.org